Investor edition Tuesday, July 21
Economy Markets Rates & Inflation

Dimon Says Markets Underestimate Risks, Yet Won’t Buy Stocks or Long-Dated Treasurys at Current Prices

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon says markets underestimate geopolitical and fiscal risks and would not buy equities or long-dated Treasurys at current prices, citing potential shocks and a risk landscape.

Jamie Dimon speaks on geopolitical and fiscal risks amid a stock market that has climbed this year
Jamie Dimon speaks on geopolitical and fiscal risks amid a stock market that has climbed this year

Market impact

Dimon cautions that risk factors beyond current pricing could shape markets and the economy.

Why it matters: Highlights how geopolitical tensions, deficits, and energy dynamics may influence asset pricing, duration exposure, and policy considerations.

Key numbers

  • S&P 500 up nearly 10% this year
  • 10-year Treasury yield around 4%–4.5%
  • inflation easing toward 2% target

Watch next

  • Geopolitical tensions (Ukraine, Middle East)
  • U.S.-China relations
  • deficits and debt dynamics
  • AI investment cycle
Financials Capital Markets JPMorgan Chase & Co.

JPMorgan Chase Chief Executive Jamie Dimon told CNBC that markets may be underestimating a broad set of geopolitical and fiscal risks that could affect asset prices. In an hourlong interview conducted after trading hours, Dimon argued that risks from wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, tensions between the United States and China, and rising military spending amid growing deficits may be larger than many investors recognize. He stressed that it is difficult to know how much of these risks are already reflected in prices and what would happen if new shocks emerge.

Dimon noted that the S&P 500 has risen this year as consumer spending remains resilient and inflation has moderated, with investors broadly embracing the artificial intelligence cycle. He pointed to recent quarterly results from JPMorgan Chase and its peers as evidence that the U.S. economy has withstood geopolitical shocks so far, but he cautioned that durability does not eliminate the possibility of a sudden inflection point, highlighting potential threats and the role of deficits and policy responses in shaping the outlook.

On Treasuries, Dimon said he would not be a buyer of long-dated U.S. government debt at current prices. He suggested that even if inflation moves back toward the Fed’s 2% target, the 10-year yield could remain higher, implying limited upside for long-dated bond prices. While leaving room to consider individual equities that could represent a compelling opportunity, he reiterated a cautious stance on the broader market at current valuations. Dimon also commented on AI spending, likening the cycle to the early internet era and noting that early winners may not be obvious in the near term.

Dimon, who leads the world’s largest bank by market value, has repeatedly flagged geopolitical and economic risks. His remarks come as markets have traded higher and as corporate earnings have supported optimism about demand and the earnings cycle in the near term. Observers are watching how shifts in deficits, energy dependence, and geopolitical developments could influence rates, financial conditions, and asset prices in the months ahead.

In the interview, Dimon acknowledged that the economy has shown resilience partly due to lower energy dependence compared with past decades, but he warned this does not eliminate the possibility of a sharp inflection point. “You may need more straws in the camel’s back to cause that tipping point,” he said, suggesting that a renewed shock could test the current momentum. He also argued that persistent budget deficits could eventually push interest rates higher as bond investors demand greater compensation for government debt.

Dimon reiterated that he would not purchase long-dated Treasurys at current prices and cautioned that even if inflation returns to target, the 10-year yield might stay around 4% to 4.5%, limiting upside for Treasury prices. On equities, he said he could consider an individual stock only if it represented a strong investment opportunity, but he would not be a buyer of the broad market at prevailing valuations. He also drew a parallel between today’s AI spending surge and the early internet boom, noting that the timeline and outcomes may differ from expectations.